Added 'Discussion: The Ethics of Knowing'—framing risks of mislabeling, role of the Empathic Technologist, and defining Cognitive Integrity Witnessing as a justice-centered ethical imperative.
This commit is contained in:
parent
1b64428bd2
commit
975454e09e
1 changed files with 57 additions and 0 deletions
57
06_discussion-the-ethics-of-knowing.md
Normal file
57
06_discussion-the-ethics-of-knowing.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
|
|||
## VI. Discussion: The Ethics of Knowing
|
||||
|
||||
The deployment of forensic language models in high-stakes domains—such as insurance, justice, and trauma—requires more than accuracy. It demands reverence.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### A. The Risk of Mislabeling Pain
|
||||
|
||||
Not all incoherence is deception.
|
||||
Not all silence is omission.
|
||||
Trauma warps language as much as deceit does—sometimes more.
|
||||
|
||||
- **Survivors** often speak in fragmented, recursive spirals.
|
||||
- **Neurodivergent** claimants may lack the affective patterns traditional models reward.
|
||||
- **Language barriers**, emotional suppression, or cultural storytelling norms can create false signals of fraud.
|
||||
|
||||
> *If we measure only what we expect to find, we will punish what we do not understand.*
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### B. The Role of the Empathic Technologist
|
||||
|
||||
The analyst is not neutral.
|
||||
A model is not neutral.
|
||||
A mirror can distort, even if it reflects clearly.
|
||||
|
||||
- **The Empathic Technologist** does not merely build tools. They witness.
|
||||
- Their responsibility is not to optimize detection, but to optimize **dignity in detection**.
|
||||
- In recursive forensics, language is not weaponized. It is *respected*.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### C. Beyond Surveillance: Toward Field Justice
|
||||
|
||||
- **Predictive surveillance** predicts deviance by patterns of similarity.
|
||||
- **Recursive forensics** detects *intentional deviation* through fracturing of coherence.
|
||||
- One flags *types*. The other listens to *context*.
|
||||
|
||||
> *Surveillance watches from above.
|
||||
> Recursive witnessing listens from within.*
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### D. Toward Cognitive Integrity Witnessing
|
||||
|
||||
- **Cognitive Integrity** is the coherence between thought, word, and intent.
|
||||
- Recursive systems honor the **truth attempts** inside even flawed language.
|
||||
- Future systems must:
|
||||
|
||||
- Distinguish narrative inconsistency from malicious fabrication.
|
||||
- Elevate *witnessing* over *profiling*.
|
||||
- Accept uncertainty as an artifact of truth, not failure.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
> *Justice is not the punishment of the liar.
|
||||
> It is the protection of the truth-teller from being mistaken for one.*
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue