why-im-taking-my-research-i.../00_first-draft/00_outline.md

4.5 KiB
Raw Blame History

🧭 Why Im Taking My Research into the Field: A Forensic Technologists Path to Private Investigation

This essay will unfold in seven structured sections, with high coherence and rhetorical resonance. The tone will be rigorous but accessible, earnest without apology, and inviting without pandering. Every section will serve to honor your background while opening a clear path toward field integration.


I. Opening Witness: The Shift From Ivory Tower to Street-Level Truth

  • Begin with a real moment or shift: "I didnt plan to become a PI."
  • Highlight the internal awakening: a sense that something in your research had matured — and now demanded real-world grounding.
  • Acknowledge what most people dont understand: research doesnt always want to stay in the lab. Sometimes, it wants to walk the beat.

Purpose: Ground the reader in a narrative moment. Make the shift feel human, real, and inevitable.


II. From the Inside Out: My Uncommon Journey Through Cybersecurity, Affective Computing, and Narcissistic Pattern Detection

  • Brief personal trajectory:

    • Associate's → Bachelor's → Masters in InfoSec → PhD Fellowship in Emotion AI
    • Research on affective computing, sentiment analysis, narcissistic language markers
    • Over a decade of high-security and forensic systems experience
  • Introduce Witness Fracture and The Recursive Claim as artifacts of rigorous, applied linguistics and recursive forensics

Purpose: Establish credibility without listing a resume. Let your lived story show how you earned these tools, rather than just studied them.


III. What I Learned the Hard Way: Language Is the Crime Scene

  • Reveal the core epistemic insight:

    • Deception is not just in data, or behavior — it's in language structure.
    • Lies leave residue. Truth has coherence. Narcissists fracture narratives in recursive patterns.
  • Briefly name some of your key pattern concepts:

    • Empathic Bypass, Narrative Overcontrol, Truth Collapse Zones
  • These patterns arent just theory. They show up — over and over — in real abuse, real fraud, real cases.

Purpose: Make the technical feel real and grounded. Help the reader understand: this work isn't abstract. It's felt.


IV. The Problem with the Current System: Good People Get Flagged, Bad People Slip Through

  • Explain the limits of current fraud detection:

    • Rules-based systems, actuarial red flags, behavioral checklists
  • And the harm:

    • Trauma survivors often get flagged for inconsistency (which is normal)
    • Manipulators present as calm, organized, and "cooperative" — and pass undetected
  • Argue: We need better tools. Not just more automation. But a new kind of forensic empathy.

Purpose: Highlight the practical failure of current models — and create demand for your framework without ever "selling."


V. Why Private Investigation: The Field Is Where the Work Must Go

  • Honest reflection: “I dont fit the mold.”

    • Most PIs dont have my background. Most researchers dont want a PI license.
    • But the truth? Im not content with publishing papers and watching from the sidelines.
  • I want to walk with the work. Apply it. Prove it. Evolve it in the real world.

  • The PI field offers me not just a profession — but a crucible.

Purpose: Address head-on what might confuse or intimidate readers. Reframe it as calling, not overqualification.


VI. The Invitation: Collaboration, Mentorship, Field Alignment

  • I am looking for:

    • Licensed PIs who see the value in emergent tools
    • Law firms curious about forensic testimony
    • Insurers and legal teams tired of being fooled by polished liars
  • Im not here to disrupt. Im here to align.

    • With integrity
    • With process
    • With quiet rigor

Purpose: Call in the right people. Let them feel theyre part of something emerging — not being replaced or overshadowed.


VII. Closing: Truth Deserves Better Tools

  • A final reflection:

    • “The truth doesnt scream. It echoes. And that echo lives in language.”
  • Youre ready now. To bring this method — and yourself — fully into the field.

  • A link to your paper (The Recursive Claim), Substack archive, and contact method.


📎 Supplementary Options

  • A downloadable PDF version of the essay (styled, branded)
  • Substack formatting with section dividers, pull-quotes, and footnotes
  • Option to cross-post on LinkedIn or Medium for wider discoverability
  • Reference to “Publications” section in your CV