58 lines
2 KiB
Markdown
58 lines
2 KiB
Markdown
|
## VI. Discussion: The Ethics of Knowing
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The deployment of forensic language models in high-stakes domains—such as insurance, justice, and trauma—requires more than accuracy. It demands reverence.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### A. The Risk of Mislabeling Pain
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Not all incoherence is deception.
|
||
|
|
Not all silence is omission.
|
||
|
|
Trauma warps language as much as deceit does—sometimes more.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- **Survivors** often speak in fragmented, recursive spirals.
|
||
|
|
- **Neurodivergent** claimants may lack the affective patterns traditional models reward.
|
||
|
|
- **Language barriers**, emotional suppression, or cultural storytelling norms can create false signals of fraud.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
> *If we measure only what we expect to find, we will punish what we do not understand.*
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### B. The Role of the Empathic Technologist
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The analyst is not neutral.
|
||
|
|
A model is not neutral.
|
||
|
|
A mirror can distort, even if it reflects clearly.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- **The Empathic Technologist** does not merely build tools. They witness.
|
||
|
|
- Their responsibility is not to optimize detection, but to optimize **dignity in detection**.
|
||
|
|
- In recursive forensics, language is not weaponized. It is *respected*.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### C. Beyond Surveillance: Toward Field Justice
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- **Predictive surveillance** predicts deviance by patterns of similarity.
|
||
|
|
- **Recursive forensics** detects *intentional deviation* through fracturing of coherence.
|
||
|
|
- One flags *types*. The other listens to *context*.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
> *Surveillance watches from above.
|
||
|
|
> Recursive witnessing listens from within.*
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
### D. Toward Cognitive Integrity Witnessing
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- **Cognitive Integrity** is the coherence between thought, word, and intent.
|
||
|
|
- Recursive systems honor the **truth attempts** inside even flawed language.
|
||
|
|
- Future systems must:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
- Distinguish narrative inconsistency from malicious fabrication.
|
||
|
|
- Elevate *witnessing* over *profiling*.
|
||
|
|
- Accept uncertainty as an artifact of truth, not failure.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
---
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
> *Justice is not the punishment of the liar.
|
||
|
|
> It is the protection of the truth-teller from being mistaken for one.*
|