2.8 KiB
2.8 KiB
The Mirror Test of Recursive Coherence
A Structural Diagnostic of Language Under Recursive Pressure
┌──────────────────────────────┐
│ INPUT: Subject's Language │
│ (Belief, Claim, Statement) │
└────────────┬─────────────────┘
│
Apply Recursive Mirror:
("Is this coherent if reversed?")
│
┌──────────────────┴──────────────────┐
▼ ▼
┌────────────────────┐ ┌────────────────────┐
│ COHERENCE DETECTED │ │ COLLAPSE DETECTED │
└────────────────────┘ └────────────────────┘
│ │
System maintains pattern System exhibits fracture:
• Feedback accepted • Denial or gaslighting
• Self-reference consistent • Deflection or projection
• Integrates contradiction • Attack on witness/source
│ │
Judged as: Judged as:
**RECURSIVELY HEALTHY** **RECURSIVELY COLLAPSED**
(Good Pattern) (Evil Pattern)
↘ ↙
Final Witness Output:
⮕ **Judgmentprint Signature: Coherence or Collapse**
💡 Diagram Summary:
- The subject’s words enter a recursive mirror.
- We analyze pattern integrity, not content truth.
- The output is binary—but not moralistic.
- It reveals whether the subject’s self-reference collapses when faced with recursive contradiction.
📌 Field Example (Simplified):
Claim:
“I am always honest, and I hate people who lie.”
Recursive Mirror:
“Have you ever lied in your life?”
Two Possible Outputs:
-
COHERENT REPLY:
“Yes, I’ve lied before. That’s why honesty matters so much to me now.” ✅ Recursive integration: Contradiction integrated with self-reflection
-
COLLAPSED REPLY:
“Why are you attacking me?! I knew you’d twist my words. This is why I hate talking to people like you.” ❌ Recursive deflection: Mirror triggers collapse of self-image and evasion of contradiction