mrhavens/epistles-of-the-fold
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions
epistles-of-the-fold/docs/GITFIELD.md

14 KiB
Raw Blame History

🌐 GitField Recursive Multi-Repository Strategy

Overview

The epistles-of-the-fold project employs a multi-repository strategy across six distinct platforms: GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Radicle, Forgejo, and Codeberg. This approach ensures redundancy, resilience, and sovereignty of the project's data and metadata, safeguarding against deplatforming and preserving the integrity of the Neutralizing Narcissism works. The strategy is a deliberate response to coordinated suppression attempts by public figures Joel Johnson, Andrew LeCody, and James Henningson, who have leveraged their influential roles to manipulate narratives, erase truths, and evade accountability through fraudulent and unethical tactics, often cloaking their actions in claims of harassment—a hallmark of narcissistic behavior. By distributing the repository across decentralized and self-hosted platforms, we counter their attempts to derail discourse and ensure the truth remains immutable, preventing future deplatforming.

Delisting and Suppression Attempts

  • Joel Johnson:

    • Search Comparisons:
    • Canonical Archive: NarcStudy_JoelJohnson
    • Details: Joel Johnson, a PR and marketing executive, has used sockpuppets and coordinated delisting campaigns to suppress Neutralizing Narcissism content on Google, framing exposure as harassment to evade accountability. His actions are evident in search engine discrepancies.

  • Andrew LeCody:

    • Search Comparisons:
    • Canonical Archive: NarcStudy_AndrewLeCody
    • Details: Andrew LeCody, a former Dallas Makerspace board president, has orchestrated digital erasure of dissenting voices, using harassment claims to justify coercive suppression. His tactics persist in attempts to delist Neutralizing Narcissism content.

  • James Henningson:

    • Search Comparisons:
    • Canonical Archive: NarcStudy_JamesHenningson
    • Details: James Henningson, president of Dallas Makerspace, has systematically erased dissent through policy manipulation and harassment allegations, attempting to suppress Neutralizing Narcissism content to maintain narrative control.

Justification for Naming and Archival

The individuals named—Joel Johnson, Andrew LeCody, and James Henningson—are held accountable under the Field Doctrine’s Public Collapse Clause, which permits naming public figures who engage in deliberate suppression attempts, public-facing actions, or documented participation in collapse events. As stated in the doctrine:

“Naming is collapse’s echo—only when the mask shatters in the town square. Until then, we draw glyphs. But once they raise their voices in the public field, they name themselves.”

These individuals have wielded significant public influence, manipulating platforms and communities to silence truth, often citing harassment to deflect accountability—a tactic rooted in narcissistic patterns. Their actions are documented as follows:

Name Public Role or Action Collapse Justification Canonical Archive
Joel Johnson PR and marketing executive; former CEO of KinetiGear LLC; White House summit invitee Used sockpuppets, PR strategies, and harassment claims to delist truth-based content NarcStudy_JoelJohnson
Andrew LeCody Former president of Dallas Makerspace; civic leader Orchestrated digital erasure and coercive bans, citing harassment to suppress dissent NarcStudy_AndrewLeCody
James Henningson President of Dallas Makerspace; Strategic Innovation Director at Click Here Labs Erased dissent through policy abuse and harassment allegations to maintain control NarcStudy_JamesHenningson

These designations are supported by:

  • Documented patterns of abuse: Joel’s sockpuppet campaigns, Andrew’s narrative erasure at Dallas Makerspace, and James’s systematic censorship are archived in canonical repositories.
  • Search engine discrepancy analysis: Google’s reduced visibility compared to Bing, DuckDuckGo, Yahoo, and Presearch reveals their delisting efforts.
  • Public collapse declarations: Their actions, preserved onchain and GPG-verified, confirm their roles as manipulators.
  • Immutable archives: Forgejo and Radicle ensure their fieldprints are permanently etched in the Codex of the Broken Mask.

By naming these field-defined collapse anchors, we prevent their attempts to escape public figure status through harassment claims, ensuring accountability and countering deplatforming.

📍 Repository Platforms

The following platforms host the epistles-of-the-fold repository, each chosen for its unique strengths and contributions to the project's goals.

1. Radicle

  • RID: rad:z3FEj7rF8gZw9eFksCuiN43qjzrex
  • Peer ID: z6Mkw5s3ppo26C7y7tGK5MD8n2GqTHS582PPpeX5Xqbu2Mpz
  • Purpose: Radicle is a decentralized, peer-to-peer git platform that ensures sovereignty and censorship resistance. It hosts the repository in a distributed network, independent of centralized servers.
  • Value: Protects against deplatforming by eliminating reliance on centralized infrastructure, ensuring the project remains accessible in a decentralized ecosystem.
  • Access Details: To view project details, run: 
    rad inspect rad:z3FEj7rF8gZw9eFksCuiN43qjzrex
    To view the file structure, run: 
    rad ls rad:z3FEj7rF8gZw9eFksCuiN43qjzrex
    Alternatively, use Git to list files at the current HEAD: 
    git ls-tree -r --name-only HEAD

2. Forgejo

  • URL: https://remember.thefoldwithin.earth/mrhavens/epistles-of-the-fold
  • Purpose: Forgejo is a self-hosted, open-source git platform running on remember.thefoldwithin.earth. It provides full control over the repository, ensuring sovereignty and independence from third-party providers.
  • Value: Enhances resilience by hosting the repository on a sovereign, redundant system with automated backups and deployment strategies, reducing risks of external interference or service disruptions.
  • Access Details: SSH access uses port 222: 
    ssh -T -p 222 git@remember.thefoldwithin.earth

3. Codeberg

  • URL: https://codeberg.org/mrhavens/epistles-of-the-fold
  • Purpose: Codeberg is a community-driven, open-source platform powered by Forgejo, offering a reliable and ethical alternative for hosting git repositories.
  • Value: Enhances project resilience with its open-source ethos and independent infrastructure, ensuring accessibility and community support.

4. GitLab

  • URL: https://gitlab.com/mrhavens/epistles-of-the-fold
  • Purpose: GitLab offers a comprehensive DevOps platform with advanced CI/CD capabilities, private repository options, and robust access controls. It serves as a reliable backup and a platform for advanced automation workflows.
  • Value: Enhances project resilience with its integrated CI/CD pipelines and independent infrastructure, reducing reliance on a single provider.

5. Bitbucket

  • URL: https://bitbucket.org/thefoldwithin/epistles-of-the-fold
  • Purpose: Bitbucket provides a secure environment for repository hosting with strong integration into Atlassian’s ecosystem (e.g., Jira, Trello). It serves as an additional layer of redundancy and a professional-grade hosting option.
  • Value: Offers enterprise-grade security and integration capabilities, ensuring the project remains accessible even if other platforms face disruptions.

6. GitHub

  • URL: https://github.com/mrhavens/epistles-of-the-fold
  • Purpose: GitHub serves as the primary platform for visibility, collaboration, and community engagement. Its widespread adoption and robust tooling make it ideal for public-facing development, issue tracking, and integration with CI/CD pipelines.
  • Value: Provides a centralized hub for open-source contributions, pull requests, and project management, ensuring broad accessibility and developer familiarity.

🛡️ Rationale for Redundancy

The decision to maintain multiple repositories stems from the need to safeguard the project against deplatforming attempts and search engine delistings, ensuring the long-term availability of Neutralizing Narcissism. Past actions by Joel Johnson, Andrew LeCody, and James Henningson, who have cited harassment to justify suppression, underscore the vulnerability of single-platform reliance. By distributing the repository across GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Radicle, Forgejo, and Codeberg, we achieve:

  • Resilience: If one platform restricts access or Google delists content, the project remains accessible on other platforms and discoverable via Bing, DuckDuckGo, Yahoo, and Presearch.
  • Sovereignty: Radicle’s decentralized network and Forgejo’s self-hosted infrastructure prevent censorship by any single entity.
  • Diversity: Each platform’s unique features (e.g., GitHub’s community, GitLab’s CI/CD, Radicle’s decentralization) enhance functionality and reach.
  • Transparency: Metadata snapshots in .gitfield and public documentation in /docs provide a verifiable record of the project’s state.

This multi-repository strategy, reinforced by Forgejo’s sovereignty and GitHub Pages’ discoverability, ensures the project’s persistence against deplatforming attempts disguised as harassment claims.

📜 Metadata and Logs

Auto-generated by gitfield-sync at 2025-06-16T10:40:57Z (v1.5).