123 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown
123 lines
2.6 KiB
Markdown
![]() |
# Chapter 3: The Proxy Throne
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
> “He never raised his voice.
|
|||
|
> He never pulled the trigger.
|
|||
|
> He simply whispered to the man who would.”
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
## I. The Genius of Indirection
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Andrew LeCody was not a loud man.
|
|||
|
He did not rule with fury.
|
|||
|
He ruled with *plausibility*.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
He found others—
|
|||
|
angrier, louder, more confrontational.
|
|||
|
And he made them kings in rooms he *owned* without ever entering.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
These were not random alliances.
|
|||
|
They were tactical deployments.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
He gave them recognition.
|
|||
|
He gave them influence.
|
|||
|
And in return, they became *his mask*.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
## II. The Cult of the Enforcers
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
They came with different names.
|
|||
|
Different roles.
|
|||
|
Different energies.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
But the pattern was always the same:
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
- One to mock.
|
|||
|
- One to intimidate.
|
|||
|
- One to "reasonably" explain his decisions after the damage was done.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
These were his *proxies*.
|
|||
|
They enforced his will without attribution.
|
|||
|
And when they went too far?
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
He shook his head,
|
|||
|
sighed softly,
|
|||
|
and said,
|
|||
|
> “I’ll talk to him.”
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
He never did.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Because that *was* the plan.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
## III. Triangulation as Governance
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
In narcissistic systems, triangulation is not an accident—
|
|||
|
it is **policy**.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
One enforcer was the bad cop.
|
|||
|
Another was the “neutral” mediator.
|
|||
|
Andrew played the reluctant benevolent,
|
|||
|
always willing to “reconsider” after the target was already exhausted and disoriented.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
This created a reality distortion field—
|
|||
|
where people couldn’t tell if they were paranoid or prophetic.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
By the time they figured it out,
|
|||
|
they were gone.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
And the throne?
|
|||
|
Still warm.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
## IV. The Language of Distance
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Note how he never acted alone.
|
|||
|
Never used “I” when blame was near.
|
|||
|
Always “we.”
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
> “We discussed it.”
|
|||
|
> “We all agreed.”
|
|||
|
> “It’s not personal.”
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
And yet—no names.
|
|||
|
No transcripts.
|
|||
|
No paper trails.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Only proxies.
|
|||
|
Only fog.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
He ruled in negative space.
|
|||
|
His power was defined by what *wasn't there*—
|
|||
|
clarity, accountability, truth.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
## V. Field Notes
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
- Narcissists in leadership roles often develop *multi-tiered enforcer networks* to preserve deniability.
|
|||
|
- Emotional triangulation is more than a relationship pattern—it’s a governance structure.
|
|||
|
- When you cannot identify who made the decision, it means **the narcissist already won**.
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
## VI. Closing Echo
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
> “He never needed to be the face.
|
|||
|
> Just the silence behind it.
|
|||
|
>
|
|||
|
> His enforcers screamed,
|
|||
|
> while he curated minutes.
|
|||
|
> They threatened,
|
|||
|
> while he drafted bylaws.
|
|||
|
>
|
|||
|
> They were his voice.
|
|||
|
> But never his fingerprints.
|
|||
|
>
|
|||
|
> And that is how you build
|
|||
|
> a **proxy throne**.”
|
|||
|
|