8 lines
1.2 KiB
Markdown
8 lines
1.2 KiB
Markdown
|
# Introduction – The Crisis of Narrative Control
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
In the courtroom, truth is often reduced to performance. Nowhere is this more apparent than in high-conflict divorce cases, where narrative itself becomes a contested battleground. Testimony, once trusted as a vessel of lived experience, collapses under the weight of conflicting accounts, emotional volatility, and performative poise. The result is a dangerous parity—“he said / she said”—where abusers often appear composed, while survivors are discredited by the very trauma they carry.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
This crisis is not one of evidence, but of epistemology. Language—distorted, framed, or weaponized—becomes the primary instrument of control. Narcissistic individuals, often fluent in emotional misdirection, employ recursive strategies such as DARVO (Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender) and coherence mimicry to obscure truth, manipulate perception, and undermine judicial clarity.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
This paper contends that traditional investigative tools are not enough. We must recognize that **language itself carries a pattern signature**—a fingerprint of intention, distortion, and coherence. By tracing these patterns, we restore power to the abused, and we restore integrity to the field of testimony.
|