Add Section IV: Critique of current fraud detection systems — exposes how trauma survivors are often penalized while manipulative claimants evade detection. Argues for forensic empathy over automation.
This commit is contained in:
parent
8bec1ebcae
commit
dbd8a65630
1 changed files with 23 additions and 0 deletions
23
04_the-problem-with-current-systems.md
Normal file
23
04_the-problem-with-current-systems.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
|
|||
## IV. **The Problem with the Current System: Good People Get Flagged, Bad People Slip Through**
|
||||
|
||||
Fraud detection today is built on the illusion of objectivity.
|
||||
|
||||
Rules-based scoring models. Behavioral red flags. Actuarial profiles. Checkbox logic. These systems are meant to catch deception — but what they often catch is *difference*.
|
||||
|
||||
Trauma survivors stumble over timelines. They forget things. They cry at the wrong moments. They freeze up. They contradict themselves not because they’re lying, but because they’re *wounded*.
|
||||
|
||||
Meanwhile, manipulators — particularly narcissistic personalities — often present as calm, collected, helpful. They *rehearse* their stories. They mirror what the system wants to hear. And they pass.
|
||||
|
||||
The result?
|
||||
|
||||
The honest get flagged.
|
||||
|
||||
The practiced glide through.
|
||||
|
||||
This isn’t a system problem. It’s an empathy problem. Or more precisely — a *lack* of forensic empathy. We need tools that understand human variation, trauma responses, and narrative complexity. Not just automation. Not just algorithms.
|
||||
|
||||
What we need is a new kind of listening. A new kind of forensic.
|
||||
|
||||
One that honors the truth without punishing the vulnerable.
|
||||
|
||||
> *Bad actors aren’t just gaming the system — they’re weaponizing it.*
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue