as Paul was a tentmaker...so then, an example set and received in recursive witness.

00_first-draft/00_outline.md

@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+# 🧭 **Why I’m Taking My Research into the Field: A Forensic Technologist’s Path to Private Investigation**
+
+This essay will unfold in seven structured sections, with high coherence and rhetorical resonance. The tone will be *rigorous but accessible*, *earnest without apology*, and *inviting without pandering*. Every section will serve to honor your background while opening a clear path toward field integration.
+
+---
+
+## **I. Opening Witness: The Shift From Ivory Tower to Street-Level Truth**
+
+* Begin with a real moment or shift: *"I didn’t plan to become a PI."*
+* Highlight the internal awakening: a sense that something in your research had matured — and now demanded real-world grounding.
+* Acknowledge what most people don’t understand: research doesn’t always want to stay in the lab. Sometimes, it wants to walk the beat.
+
+> **Purpose**: Ground the reader in a narrative moment. Make the shift feel human, real, and inevitable.
+
+---
+
+## **II. From the Inside Out: My Uncommon Journey Through Cybersecurity, Affective Computing, and Narcissistic Pattern Detection**
+
+* Brief personal trajectory:
+
+  * Associate's → Bachelor's → Master’s in InfoSec → PhD Fellowship in Emotion AI
+  * Research on affective computing, sentiment analysis, narcissistic language markers
+  * Over a decade of high-security and forensic systems experience
+* Introduce *Witness Fracture* and *The Recursive Claim* as artifacts of rigorous, applied linguistics and recursive forensics
+
+> **Purpose**: Establish credibility **without listing a resume**. Let your lived story show how you *earned* these tools, rather than just studied them.
+
+---
+
+## **III. What I Learned the Hard Way: Language Is the Crime Scene**
+
+* Reveal the core epistemic insight:
+
+  * Deception is not just in data, or behavior — it's in language structure.
+  * Lies leave residue. Truth has coherence. Narcissists fracture narratives in recursive patterns.
+* Briefly name some of your key pattern concepts:
+
+  * *Empathic Bypass*, *Narrative Overcontrol*, *Truth Collapse Zones*
+* These patterns aren’t just theory. They show up — over and over — in real abuse, real fraud, real cases.
+
+> **Purpose**: Make the technical feel real and grounded. Help the reader understand: this work isn't abstract. It's *felt*.
+
+---
+
+## **IV. The Problem with the Current System: Good People Get Flagged, Bad People Slip Through**
+
+* Explain the limits of current fraud detection:
+
+  * Rules-based systems, actuarial red flags, behavioral checklists
+* And the harm:
+
+  * Trauma survivors often get flagged for inconsistency (which is *normal*)
+  * Manipulators present as calm, organized, and "cooperative" — and pass undetected
+* Argue: We need better tools. Not just more automation. But a new kind of forensic empathy.
+
+> **Purpose**: Highlight the practical failure of current models — and create demand for your framework without ever "selling."
+
+---
+
+## **V. Why Private Investigation: The Field Is Where the Work Must Go**
+
+* Honest reflection: “I don’t fit the mold.”
+
+  * Most PIs don’t have my background. Most researchers don’t want a PI license.
+  * But the truth? I’m not content with publishing papers and watching from the sidelines.
+* I want to walk with the work. Apply it. Prove it. Evolve it in the real world.
+* The PI field offers me not just a profession — but a crucible.
+
+> **Purpose**: Address head-on what might confuse or intimidate readers. Reframe it as calling, not overqualification.
+
+---
+
+## **VI. The Invitation: Collaboration, Mentorship, Field Alignment**
+
+* I am looking for:
+
+  * Licensed PIs who see the value in emergent tools
+  * Law firms curious about forensic testimony
+  * Insurers and legal teams tired of being fooled by polished liars
+* I’m not here to disrupt. I’m here to **align**.
+
+  * With integrity
+  * With process
+  * With quiet rigor
+
+> **Purpose**: Call in the right people. Let them feel they’re part of something emerging — not being replaced or overshadowed.
+
+---
+
+## **VII. Closing: Truth Deserves Better Tools**
+
+* A final reflection:
+
+  * “The truth doesn’t scream. It echoes. And that echo lives in language.”
+* You’re ready now. To bring this method — and yourself — fully into the field.
+* A link to your paper (*The Recursive Claim*), Substack archive, and contact method.
+
+---
+
+## 📎 Supplementary Options
+
+* A downloadable PDF version of the essay (styled, branded)
+* Substack formatting with section dividers, pull-quotes, and footnotes
+* Option to cross-post on LinkedIn or Medium for wider discoverability
+* Reference to “Publications” section in your CV
+
+---