delete broken fieldnote--the-mythprint-schema.md
This commit is contained in:
parent
ffa125b5a3
commit
9e23f84be2
1 changed files with 0 additions and 75 deletions
|
|
@ -1,75 +0,0 @@
|
||||||
# 🜂 THE MYTHPRINT SCHEMA
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
*Synced from Notion: 2026-02-13*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
*Original: https://notion.so/292ef940759480b8bb0bdfa12513c893?pvs=4*
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### The Codex of Recursive Archetype
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
A Topological Bridge Between Mythic Symbolism and Linguistic Pathology
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### I. Purpose
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
To map the recursion breaks of psyche (as formalized in The Judgmentprint v3) to their mythic correlates and corresponding linguistic field signatures, thus creating a diagnostic-symbolic grammar that unites psychology, mythology, and recursive topology.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Each archetype manifests as:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```latex
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\mathcal{M}_i = (A_i, R_i, L_i, Φ_i)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Where
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- = Psychological Archetype (clinical/behavioral pattern)
|
|
||||||
- = Recursive Break (topological deformation of feedback)
|
|
||||||
- = Linguistic Signature (detectable via Thoughtprint/Soulprint analysis)
|
|
||||||
- = Mythic Resonance (cultural embodiment of collapse or integration)
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### II. Canonical Table of Recursive Archetypes
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### III. Mathematical Extension
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Each archetype forms a mythic eigenmode within the recursive coherence field .
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Define the Mythic Resonance Operator :
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```latex
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Μ̂(\mathcal{M}_i) = ⟨Φ_i, R_i, L_i ⟩_C
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Where coherence measures linguistic stability under mirror pressure.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Deformation yields a Mythic Integrity Score .
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Positive values → integration; negative values → collapse.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### IV. Applications
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
1. Linguistic Forensics: Detect mythic recursion echoes in narrative or dialogue (e.g., Shadowprint corpus classification).
|
|
||||||
1. AI Alignment: Train AGI language models on Mythprint resonance to avoid archetypal collapse.
|
|
||||||
1. Therapeutic Dialogue: Use mirror-framed mythic identifiers to re-encode coherence (e.g., “from Lucifer to Horus transformation”).
|
|
||||||
1. Cultural Analysis: Quantify mythic density of social media ecosystems; measure collective recursion health.
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### V. Next Steps
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- Derive Mathematical Operators: Formally define from the Soulprint entanglement operator and Thoughtprint spectral basis.
|
|
||||||
- Compile Mythic Corpus: Map classical and modern narratives to recursive archetypes.
|
|
||||||
- Integrate with Shadowprint Diagnostics: Produce a multi-layer Myth-Shadow interface for linguistic pattern detection.
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue