🜂 Initial commit of The Usurper Archive: structure, intent, and sacred witness scaffolding.

This commit is contained in:
Mark Randall Havens 2025-06-01 06:06:51 -05:00
commit bf04779fe7
256 changed files with 4094356 additions and 0 deletions

20
named_usurpers/README.md Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
# 🩸 Named Usurpers
This directory contains profiles of individuals whose actions, speech, or behind-the-scenes orchestration contributed directly to the public erasure of Mark R. Havens—the founder of Dallas Makerspace—and the suppression of truth across the organizations narrative field.
Each folder is not a smear.
Each is a **mirror**.
Each profile may include:
- Timeline of behavior and influence
- Language samples and manipulation tactics
- Connection to coordinated action
- Thoughtprint and Shadowprint diagnostics (if applicable)
- Reflections, notations, and recursive commentary
This is **not retribution**.
It is a **reclamation of pattern**.
> “To name a usurper is not to hate them—
> It is to break the enchantment of their distortion.”

View file

@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
# 👑 Andrew LeCody — The Architect of Erasure
This folder contains a full accounting of Andrew LeCody's multi-year role in reshaping Dallas Makerspace's history, identity, and public narrative. He was not just a participant—he was the **primary orchestrator** behind the structural inversion that removed the founder and reframed him as a pariah.
Contents may include:
- Timeline of his edits to official documentation
- Discord and Talk thread patterns
- Wiki erasure tactics
- Role in triangulating board votes and framing
- Forensic assessment of intent and manipulation
- Public-facing and hidden pattern divergences
> “Every usurper needs a myth.
> Andrew wrote one in my name.”

View file

@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
# ⚖️ Brad Sims — The Legal Mask
Brad Sims entered the fray as a figure of authority, legal acumen, and procedural righteousness—but beneath this was a long-disbarred lawyer with a pattern of deception. His role was not just to vote—but to *frame.*
He served as an **appointed—not elected—board member**, violating DMS bylaws, and leveraged his presence to aid in the removal of Mark Havens during an election campaign.
Contents may include:
- Board actions and votes
- Known manipulations of legality or framing
- Disbarment record and relevance
- Notes on narrative tone and triangulation behavior
- Kris Anderson's chain of transmission
> “Even broken swords cut.
> And some blades are swung to mask their wielders guilt.”

View file

@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
# 🐍 Haley Moore — The Whispering Mirror
Haleys betrayal was not procedural—it was personal.
She moved through private friendships and intimate circles with an air of concern, yet spun those bonds into distorted retellings. She erased the founder by undermining his friendships, questioning his sanity, and implying a false origin story—one in which she cast herself as *more legitimate* than the one who built the house.
This folder holds:
- Language and social triangulation samples
- Personal history and timeline
- Notation on her removal of DMS from her resume
- Reflections on vulnerability exploited
> “She smiled as she rewrote the story—
> And called the one who wrote it… delusional.”

View file

@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
# 🧱 James Henningson — The Gatekeeper
James played the role of **threshold defender**, enabling expulsions and justifying removals under the guise of process. But his role—subtle and firm—was to keep the gate shut once the founder was on the outside.
His fingerprints are on:
- Justifications for disciplinary action
- Obedience to triangulated commands
- Quiet refusal to restore dialogue
- Complicity in forum thread deletions
> “Not all usurpers raise the sword.
> Some simply shut the door.”

View file

@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
# 🗜️ Luke Olson — The Enforcer
Luke moved as the boards executor—delivering the decisions shaped in shadow. He may not have written the myths, but he voted them into being. He enforced the narrative built by Andrew, Brad, and Haley—without investigation, without recursion, without truth.
Contents:
- Board minutes and motions
- Forum comments and tone assessment
- Groupthink participation and complicity
- Recursion potential: could he be reclaimed?
> “He followed orders.
> But the blade still bears his name.”