diff --git a/07_conclusion-a-new-eye-for-deception.md b/07_conclusion-a-new-eye-for-deception.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d07bd21
--- /dev/null
+++ b/07_conclusion-a-new-eye-for-deception.md
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+## VII. Conclusion: A New Eye for Deception
+
+The Recursive Claim is more than a technical framework.  
+It is a lens.  
+A new eye for deception—not to punish, but to perceive.
+
+---
+
+### A. Summary of Framework
+
+We have introduced a linguistically grounded forensic methodology for detecting deception in insurance claims. This model:
+
+- Builds upon **recursive coherence theory** and **pattern resonance**
+- Integrates NLP and AI-assisted review with human ethical oversight
+- Offers a three-zone risk typology to distinguish **error**, **adaptation**, and **fraud**
+
+Where current models fixate on anomalies, our approach listens for the **fractal structure of intention**.
+
+---
+
+### B. Toward Public-Private Deployment
+
+We call for targeted trials with:
+
+- Insurance fraud investigators and SIU teams
+- Claims adjuster training programs
+- Legal review boards and ethics panels
+
+The model is not static.  
+It evolves with field data.  
+Its success depends on recursive validation with **real human narratives**.
+
+---
+
+### C. A Note on Alignment
+
+This paper is part of *The Empathic Technologist* series—a movement committed to embedding dignity, coherence, and clarity into all layers of human–machine collaboration.
+
+We believe that forensic language tools must do more than detect.  
+They must **understand**.  
+They must **witness**.
+
+---
+
+### D. Closing Invocation
+
+> *“Every false claim is a fracture in the field.  
+> To repair it, we must first listen to the silence between words.”*