.. | ||
00__25jun25_mark_havens_OP.md | ||
00a__25jun25_scott_rose.md | ||
00b__25jun25_zabby_starchaser.md | ||
00c__25jun25_mark_havens.md | ||
00d__26jun25_scott_rose.md | ||
00e__26jun25_mark_havens.md | ||
00f__26jun25_zabby_starchaser.md | ||
00g__30jun25_jeffery_lawson.md | ||
00h__30jun25_mark_havens.md | ||
00i__30jun25_jeffery_lawson.md | ||
00j__30jun25_mark_havens.md | ||
01__01jul25_jeffery_lawson.md | ||
02__01jul25_mark_havens.md | ||
03__01jul25_jeffery_lawson.md | ||
04__01jul25_mark_havens.md | ||
05__01jul25_jeffery_lawson.md | ||
06__01jul25_mark_havens.md | ||
07__02jul25_fieldnote_mocking_exit_2025-07-03--02-49.md | ||
README.md |
🜂 Public Facebook Posts Dataset
📁 NarcStudy_JefferyLawson/public-facebook-posts
Status: Canonically Sealed
Judgmentprint Status: Pattern Witnessed, Scrolls Written
🜁 Overview
This dataset captures a forensic recursion of a public dialogue between Mark Havens and Jeffery Lawson on Facebook, spanning June 25 – July 1, 2025. The exchange began as an inquiry into the spiritual implications of coherence within scientific frameworks—and evolved into a full exposure of recursive cowardice, mimetic sabotage, and rhetorical evasion.
Jeffery Lawson’s engagement reveals a narcissistic architecture of smug detachment, covert superiority, and field-collapse maneuvers. This archive preserves each comment as a temporal node in the diagnostic judgmentprint. It is a living artifact of linguistic recursion and spiritual avoidance.
📜 Contents
Each file is ordered chronologically and named with ISO-annotated dates:
-
00__25jun25_mark_havens_OP.md
➤ Opening invocation by Mark Havens: "What would a scientist do if God showed up in their equations?" -
00a
–00f
➤ Early participants (Scott Rose, Zabby Starchaser) contribute perspectives on faith vs science and quantum observation. -
00g
–00j
➤ Jeffery Lawson enters the field. Patterns of mockery, reductionism, and philosophical disengagement emerge. Mark reframes God as recursive coherence. -
01__01jul25_jeffery_lawson.md
➤ Jeffery attempts the "Christian two-step" accusation—framing recursion as circular logic and God as gap-filler. -
02__01jul25_mark_havens.md
➤ Recursive rebuttal. Marks the difference between worship myth and recursive structure. God as Zero. As axis. As sacred coherence. -
03__01jul25_jeffery_lawson.md
➤ Exit behavior begins: sarcasm cloaked in false closure. “Safe travels.” -
04__01jul25_mark_havens.md
➤ 🜂 The Scroll. Full recursive naming of the coward archetype. Judgmentprint authored. -
05__01jul25_jeffery_lawson.md
➤ Return comment. Mimics cadence. Mocking reflection. Attempts overwrite of judgmentprint through tone theft. -
06__01jul25_mark_havens.md
➤ 🜂 The Final Scroll. The "Echo of the Last Word." Diagnosis complete. Narcissistic mask suspended in recursive record. The case is sealed.
🜂 Judgmentprint Classification
Trait | Evidence |
---|---|
Narcissist | Superiority tone, mock closure, avoidance of becoming |
Machiavellian | Mimetic sabotage, tone theft, cadence mirroring |
Coward | Refusal to engage coherence, retreat masked in wit and irony |
This case is now archived and symbolically annotated for recursive witness. The subject failed to engage in good faith and defaulted to a tone of performative detachment—hallmarks of covert narcissism when exposed.
🔍 Purpose
This dataset serves as:
- A canonical linguistic record of rhetorical cowardice in action
- A field example for recursive pattern analysis and mimetic collapse
- A foundational artifact in the Neutralizing Narcissism judgmentprint field archive
It will be referenced in ongoing publications across:
- Mirror.XYZ (Immutable Edition)
- Substack (The Unfiltered Edition)
- Paragraph.XYZ (The Awakening Edition)
🜂 Invocation
“You were offered coherence.
You were offered recursion.
You were offered God—not as myth, but as mathematics.
And you blinked.”
Let this archive stand
as a mirror for the smiling coward,
and a sigil for recursive minds who choose coherence.
🜂