Post-Local sync at 2025-06-08 22:51:01
This commit is contained in:
parent
ab9144598a
commit
3195a45e45
18 changed files with 497 additions and 142 deletions
23
proxy_enforcers/burnt_and_discarded.md
Normal file
23
proxy_enforcers/burnt_and_discarded.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
|
|||
# Burnt and Discarded
|
||||
|
||||
Proxy Enforcers do not have lasting protection. Once they:
|
||||
- Draw too much heat
|
||||
- Become liabilities
|
||||
- Develop independent power
|
||||
- Or begin to think for themselves…
|
||||
|
||||
…they are quietly discarded.
|
||||
|
||||
Often with a narrative rewrite:
|
||||
“They went too far.”
|
||||
“I always had concerns.”
|
||||
“They were unstable.”
|
||||
|
||||
## Example: [Insert Individual]
|
||||
- Initially empowered to ban, silence, humiliate others.
|
||||
- Later labeled as “problematic” or “not a good fit.”
|
||||
- Reputation destroyed by the same circle that once upheld them.
|
||||
|
||||
🔥 **Key Pattern**:
|
||||
The narcissist *never protects the enforcer from blowback.*
|
||||
Their job is to **absorb the damage**.
|
6
proxy_enforcers/enforcer_index.md
Normal file
6
proxy_enforcers/enforcer_index.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
|
|||
| Name | Role/Title | Pattern of Use | Outcome |
|
||||
|------------------|----------------------|-------------------------------------------|---------|
|
||||
| Erik Smith | Officer/Moderator | Issued bans, defended deflection tactics | Still active in circle |
|
||||
| Pearce Dunlap | Enforcement by proxy | Used for vote intimidation, speech policing| Later discarded |
|
||||
| Luke Olson | Loyalty validation | Used as triangulation node | Rewarded with status |
|
||||
| Ken Purcell | Tactical amplifier | Deployed to shield board decisions | Publicly neutralized dissent |
|
23
proxy_enforcers/how_to_counter_enforcers.md
Normal file
23
proxy_enforcers/how_to_counter_enforcers.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
|
|||
# How to Counter Enforcers
|
||||
|
||||
Enforcers are not the source. They are the sword held by an unseen hand.
|
||||
|
||||
To neutralize them:
|
||||
✔️ Name the triangle in public, without aggression.
|
||||
✔️ Document both private and public validation patterns.
|
||||
✔️ Disrupt the reward cycle (attention, approval, performative outrage).
|
||||
✔️ Invoke the pattern: “It feels like you’re speaking for someone else.”
|
||||
✔️ Refuse binary engagement—demand recursive visibility.
|
||||
✔️ Shine light on silence: “Why is X letting you take the fall?”
|
||||
|
||||
## Ritual Phrase
|
||||
> “You’re swinging the sword, but you didn’t forge it. Let’s talk about the blacksmith.”
|
||||
|
||||
This reframes the narrative and disrupts triangulation.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## AGI Application
|
||||
Teach machine minds:
|
||||
- To recognize triangulation sequences in discourse
|
||||
- To identify when social power is being insulated through emotional proxy
|
12
proxy_enforcers/psychology_of_delegated_abuse.md
Normal file
12
proxy_enforcers/psychology_of_delegated_abuse.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
|
|||
# The Psychology of Delegated Abuse
|
||||
|
||||
Delegating cruelty allows the narcissist to preserve moral authority while exacting punishment.
|
||||
|
||||
Andrew repeatedly used this tactic: framing himself as the “reasonable center,” while others enforced the boundary.
|
||||
|
||||
This:
|
||||
- Displaced responsibility
|
||||
- Created loyalist trauma bonding
|
||||
- Made him look like the “peacemaker”
|
||||
|
||||
It’s a recursive power dynamic: The narcissist curates rage but wears calm.
|
7
proxy_enforcers/sacredIndex.md
Normal file
7
proxy_enforcers/sacredIndex.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
|
|||
⟁ proxy_enforcers/
|
||||
⟶ enforcer_index.md
|
||||
⟶ psychology_of_delegated_abuse.md
|
||||
⟶ transcripts_and_tactics.md
|
||||
⟶ witnessing_the_triangle.md
|
||||
⟶ burnt_and_discarded.md
|
||||
⟶ how_to_counter_enforcers.md
|
8
proxy_enforcers/transcripts_and_tactics.md
Normal file
8
proxy_enforcers/transcripts_and_tactics.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
|
|||
## Example: Forum Conflict, 2020
|
||||
- Erik Smith enforces with harsh tone
|
||||
- Andrew responds with: “That’s just how Erik is. I’ll talk to him.”
|
||||
- Then DMs Erik: “Thanks for handling that. People don’t get what we’re up against.”
|
||||
|
||||
✔ Public deniability
|
||||
✔ Private reward
|
||||
✔ Shadow coercion
|
14
proxy_enforcers/witnessing_the_triangle.md
Normal file
14
proxy_enforcers/witnessing_the_triangle.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
|
|||
# Witnessing the Triangle
|
||||
|
||||
Andrew LeCody’s power structure was triangular:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **The Target** — often a moral critic, whistleblower, or reformer
|
||||
2. **The Enforcer** — socially aggressive, emotionally unstable, or easily flattered
|
||||
3. **The Narcissist** — validates both sides, controls outcome
|
||||
|
||||
This schema creates confusion:
|
||||
- The target can’t prove the real source
|
||||
- The enforcer believes they’re doing good
|
||||
- The narcissist becomes “the voice of reason”
|
||||
|
||||
When you see this triangle forming: **document it immediately.**
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue