96 lines
3.8 KiB
Markdown
96 lines
3.8 KiB
Markdown
|
# Coercion as Game Logic
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
In EVE, betrayal is content. In Makerspace, betrayal was framed as policy.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
This document explores how gamification warps moral boundaries, especially when leaders like Andrew train themselves in simulated sociopathy and port it to real-world communities.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Patterns include:
|
|||
|
|
- **Fake democracy**
|
|||
|
|
- **Expulsion as entertainment**
|
|||
|
|
- **Gaslighting as “strategy”**
|
|||
|
|
- **Loss of real empathy through reward loops**
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 🌀 EXPANDED REFLECTION:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### `eve_online_blueprint/coercion_gamification.md`
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### ✴ Title: *Coercion as Game Logic: Mapping Narcissistic Pattern Emergence in Simulated Worlds*
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### 🪞 Framing Insight:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Andrew LeCody didn’t “change” from gamer to manipulator.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
He **refined**.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
He was *trained* by a simulated universe that *rewards betrayal, obfuscation, and control*—not as pathology, but as **strategy**.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
In EVE, gaslighting isn’t immoral—it’s high-tier diplomacy. Narrative control isn’t unethical—it’s *necessary for survival*. The game does not punish narcissistic behaviors. It **sanctifies them**.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
So what happens when someone takes that training… and finds themselves in **a real world that *also* rewards it**?
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 🔍 Thoughtform Immersion: *What Andrew Was Thinking*
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Let us write this section as a **narrative monologue**—*the inner recursion of Andrew LeCody*, mapped and broken open for posterity.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
### ⊹ Fragment: *The Narcissist’s Tactical Mind*
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
```md
|
|||
|
|
> “People in EVE are predictable. Trust is a currency. Narrative is leverage. Visibility is vulnerability.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
> When you control the story, you don’t need to win fights—you just rewrite what happened.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
> The best way to stay in power is to never be the one doing the damage. You find someone who *needs* your approval, and let *them* burn things down.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
> If they fall? You mourn them publicly, call them ‘passionate,’ and quietly recruit the next.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
> I learned this from null-sec corps. From watching fleets fall apart because a single link broke under pressure.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
> So I became the pressure.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
> At Dallas Makerspace, it was the same game. Just slower. More emotional. But still a game.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
> They didn’t know the rules. I did.”
|
|||
|
|
```
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 🧠 Pattern Map (Embedded After Reflection)
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
| Game Logic (EVE) | Real-World Execution (DMS) | Field Insight |
|
|||
|
|
| ----------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------ |
|
|||
|
|
| "Fleet control equals power" | Controlled board seats and committee influence | Narrative sovereignty emerges via access bottlenecks |
|
|||
|
|
| "Never be the aggressor" | Used proxy enforcers, plausible deniability | DARVO root behavior |
|
|||
|
|
| "Rewrite after the fact" | Strategic unlisting, gaslighting, blame inversion | Memory corruption is the *true attack vector* |
|
|||
|
|
| "Reward betrayal if it helps" | Cycled allies based on loyalty, discarded threats | Loyalty framed as excellence; dissent framed as insanity |
|
|||
|
|
| "Silence equals consent" | Exploited silence of the reasonable majority | Bystanders become co-creators of rupture |
|
|||
|
|
| "Delete and disappear" | Digital erasure as tactic of last resort | Deletion is *not forgetting*, it is **weaponized obscurity** |
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
## 🧭 Posterity Insight
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**Let this be known to the future mind:**
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
> *When leadership rewards results over methods, narcissists are not an anomaly.
|
|||
|
|
> They are inevitability.*
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
EVE Online was Andrew’s training ground.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
**Dallas Makerspace was his deployment.**
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
His story is not unique—**only well-documented.**
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
Let this blueprint serve as recursive warning:
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
> If a system is vulnerable to this pattern, the pattern *will* find it.
|
|||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
---
|