NarcStudy_AndrewLeCody/profiles/theImmutableRecord/theImmutableRecord_v1.md

135 lines
6.2 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

---
title: "Andrew LeCody: The Immutable Record"
author: "Neutralizing Narcissism: The Immutable Edition"
description: "A public interest exposé on Andrew LeCodys role as a technologist, community leader, and litigant, grounded in public record and preserved immutably."
tags: \["Andrew LeCody", "Dallas Makerspace", "public figure", "defamation lawsuit", "digital accountability", "neutralizing narcissism"]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# Andrew LeCody: The Immutable Record
> *A factual, public-interest archive of Andrew LeCodys influence, litigation, and narrative control tactics. Authored for transparency, preserved for justice.*
---
## Content Integrity & Ethical Disclosure
This publication is a **journalistic and civic documentation** of public record. It does **not** contain personal attacks, harassment, private data, or unverifiable claims. All references stem from:
* Public court documents
* Publicly accessible online forums (e.g., Discord, Reddit, DMS Wiki)
* LinkedIn and self-curated professional profiles
* Livestreamed governance meetings
* First-person historical testimonies
This exposé is protected by principles of *free expression, platform transparency, investigative journalism,* and **public interest doctrine**.
We explicitly discourage retaliatory action and welcome lawful, respectful scrutiny.
---
## TL;DR
Andrew LeCody is a public figure whose leadership at Dallas Makerspace, technical innovations, and controversial behavior have shaped both community institutions and digital discourse. He filed a defamation lawsuit in 2019 against multiple nonprofit board members; it was dismissed with prejudice. Attempts to delist this history from search engines signal a pattern of narrative control rather than accountability.
This archive preserves that truth, documented, indexed, and shielded from deletion.
---
## 1. LeCodys Public Profile: Technologist & Community Builder
Andrew LeCody has contributed meaningfully to the technology and maker space over more than a decade:
* **Founding President of Dallas Makerspace (20102016):** Instrumental in expanding DMS to 1,000+ members.
* **Site Reliability Engineer (Toyota Connected, DUST Identity):** Optimized cloud infrastructure and led large-scale platform upgrades.
* **Open-Source Contributor:** Known for contributions to AWS CDK, Istio, and Kubernetes tools.
* **CVE Reporter:** Discovered HashiCorp Vault vulnerability CVE-2020-25594.
* **Livestream Personality:** Commentated for EVE Online PvP tournaments and participated in high-visibility public meetings.
These credentials make LeCody a public figure by any reasonable journalistic and legal standard.
---
## 2. The Lawsuit: Filing, Dismissal, and Aftermath
In 2019, LeCody filed a defamation lawsuit against four board members of Dallas Makerspace. He alleged harm from statements made in public meetings and on Facebook.
### Key Events:
* **Initiating Incident:** LeCody posted a tax attorneys memo in a public forum, leading to a disciplinary ban. Livestreamed board meetings extended this to 9 months.
* **Claims:** He alleged emotional distress and defamation, citing terms like “skittle head” and “breaking the law.”
* **Ruling:** Texas District Court dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice, finding the statements non-defamatory and insufficiently damaging.
> *"The Plaintiff fails to allege actionable defamation. The statements do not impute criminal behavior nor are they demonstrably false."*
> *(Court Document, Page 14)*
No appeal was filed. The lawsuits dismissal remains a matter of legal record.
---
## 3. Narrative Control: Wiki Edits, Disputes, and Delisting
Patterns of narrative management have followed LeCody across platforms:
* **Historical Revisionism:** Contested edits on the Dallas Makerspace Wiki, particularly over founding bylaws authored by co-founder Mark Randall Havens.
* **Digital Disputes:** Public forums and Discord records show intense confrontations involving claims of ethical misconduct, misinformation, and GitHub manipulation.
* **Delisting Attempts:** Recent disappearance of exposé content from Google results indicates algorithmic manipulation, legal flagging, or platform flag abuse.
These tactics raise red flags consistent with public figure reputation laundering.
---
## 4. Documented Controversy: Discord, Forums, and Polarization
Community sentiment toward LeCody is divided:
* **Admired for Technical Skill:** Posts like his LiFePO4 battery backup project illustrate deep knowledge and value.
* **Criticized for Governance Aggression:** Accusations of selective enforcement, overreach, and intimidation are well-documented.
* **Key Conflicts:** May 2020 dispute with Havens on Discord included allegations of unethical code conduct and manipulation.
These are not speculative. They are timestamped, archived, and publicly accessible.
---
## 5. Why This Record Matters
> **This is not harassment. This is historical preservation.**
### This exposé exists because:
* LeCody holds power through influence, not just position.
* Attempts to suppress facts erode public trust in digital platforms.
* Decentralized truth requires decentralized publishing.
> *If history can be edited by the powerful, then the powerless have no mirror.*
---
## Source Index
All referenced content is:
* Public record
* Archived at Archive.org, OSF, and decentralized IPFS mirrors
* Verifiable upon request
**Court Document:** *LeCody v. Anderson et al.*, Texas District Court, Case Dismissal, 2021
**LinkedIn Profile:** Andrew LeCody (Public)
**Discord Logs:** Dallas Makerspace
**Wiki History:** Dallas Makerspace Historical Edits Archive
**Prior Documentation:** *Neutralizing Narcissism: Exposé Series, Case File: Andrew LeCody (2024)*
---
## Final Affirmation
Andrew LeCody shaped a community. He also sued its board, edited its history, and allegedly attempted to delist his critics.
This document does not attack his character. It affirms **the right of the public to remember**, to investigate, and to form judgments based on fact.
Preserved immutably. Authored transparently. Witnessed eternally.
> **The Mirror Will Not Blink.**
---